Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
4 BN 27/19, 4 BN 27/19 (4 CN 7/19) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2019:250919B4BN27.19.0 KI-generiert

Grant of revision for subsequent divergence from prior case law

Geschäftsnummer 4 BN 27/19, 4 BN 27/19 (4 CN 7/19)
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Deutschland (DE)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Federal Administrative Court granted the complaint for leave to appeal and ordered the admission of the revision proceedings, effectively prevailing for the appellant at this procedural stage. The dispute concerned a legal divergence, specifically where the judgment under challenge deviated from the Senate's own decision of June 6, 2019 (B 4 CN 7.18). The decisive legal basis for this outcome was § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 VwGO, which mandates the admission of revision in cases of subsequent divergence from a higher court's precedent, with the procedural cost and value assessment governed by §§ 47, 52, and 63 GKG.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG; Grant of revision for subsequent divergence from prior case law: The dispute concerned a legal divergence, specifically where the judgment under challenge deviated from the Senate's own decision of June 6, 2019 (B 4 CN 7.18). The decisive legal basis for this outcome was § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 VwGO, which mandates the admission of revision in cases of subsequent divergence from a higher court's precedent, with the procedural cost and value assessment governed by §§ 47, 52, and 63 GKG.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Revision eines Entscheids Vorherige Verwaltungsbeschwerde Streitwert prozessleitende Verfügungen Begründung einer Praxisänderung vorläufige Aufnahme

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 VwGO
Legal basis for admitting the revision due to subsequent divergence from the Senate's previous decision.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Provision cited for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Provision cited for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.
§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG
Provision cited for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.
KI-generiert
4 B 67/09, 4 B 67/09 (4 C 7/10)
Admission of revision due to divergence from established case law on construction law interpretation
4 BN 41/18
Admissibility of revision complaint: divergence ground requiring precise contrast of substantive legal propositions rather than editorial summaries
4 B 21/22
Non-admission of revision for revision complaint: cross-referencing prior Senate decision to waive detailed justification under § 133 Abs. 5 VwGO
10 B 15/15
Admissibility of revision for divergence and claim amendments in declaratory actions against chamber officials regarding affiliated association statements
5 B 32/18 D
Non-Admissibility of Revision: Specificity Requirements for Fundamental Significance, Divergence, and Procedural Errors in Compensation Claims for Excessive Proceedings

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 VwGO

Legal basis for admitting the revision due to subsequent divergence from the Senate's previous decision.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Provision cited for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG

Provision cited for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Provision cited for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Revisionszulassung wegen nachträglicher Divergenz

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde ist begründet. Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 VwGO wegen nachträglicher Abweichung des angefochtenen Urteils von der Entscheidung des Senats vom 6. Juni 2019 - BVerwG 4 CN 7.18 - zuzulassen.

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.