Admission of revision on whether state examination regulations must allow a candidate unexcusably late for the remainder of an oral legal professional qualification exam to complete it under the principles of professional freedom and proportionality.

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, Art. 12 Abs. 1 GG, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG; Admission of revision on whether state examination regulations must allow a candidate unexcusably late for the remainder of an oral legal professional qualification exam to complete it under the principles of professional freedom and proportionality: The dispute concerned the validity of a plaintiff's failure in a legal professional qualification examination, specifically challenging whether state law permits a candidate who completed part of the oral exam to be barred from the remaining portions due to unexcused late arrival. The decisive legal basis involves the interplay between state examination regulations, the fundamental right to professional freedom under Article 12(1) of the German Basic Law, and the principle of proportionality, with the core question being whether national law must allow such candidates to participate in the remainder of the exam to avoid failing.