Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
5 PB 1/17, 5 PB 1/17 (5 P 1/18) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2018:080118B5PB1.17.0 KI-generiert

Effect of works committee decision on personnel measures for non-sovereign employees under § 80 Abs. 1 Buchst. b Nr. 1 PersVG

Geschäftsnummer 5 PB 1/17, 5 PB 1/17 (5 P 1/18)
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Deutschland (DE)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) admitted an appeal on points of law, ruling in favor of the appealing party, without deciding the merits of the case at this stage. The dispute concerns the legal effect of a works committee (Einigungsstelle) decision regarding a specific personnel measure—the temporary assignment of employees—under the personnel rights act for state government employees. The court identified an open question of fundamental significance regarding the validity and binding nature of such a works committee decision when the affected employee does not exercise sovereign or public authority functions, thereby leaving the lower instances' outcomes pending further review. The decisive legal basis involves the interplay between the state personnel rights act, specifically the provisions on personnel measures and works committee competence, and the procedural rules governing appeals in labor and personnel disputes.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

§ 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2 ArbGG, § 113 Abs. 2 SPersVG, § 72 Abs. 2 Nr. 1, § 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2 ArbGG; Effect of works committee decision on personnel measures for non-sovereign employees under § 80 Abs. 1 Buchst. b Nr. 1 PersVG: The dispute concerns the legal effect of a works committee (Einigungsstelle) decision regarding a specific personnel measure—the temporary assignment of employees—under the personnel rights act for state government employees. The court identified an open question of fundamental significance regarding the validity and binding nature of such a works committee decision when the affected employee does not exercise sovereign or public authority functions, thereby leaving the lower instances' outcomes pending further review. The decisive legal basis involves the interplay between the state personnel rights act, specifically the provisions on personnel measures and works committee competence, and the procedural rules governing appeals in labor and personnel disputes.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Verfahrensrechte Verwaltungsberuf Recht auf Arbeit Arbeitsstreitigkeiten Öffentliche Arbeiten Hoheitsakt

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
§ 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2 ArbGG
1, § 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2 ArbGG wegen einer entscheidungserheblichen Rechtsfrage von grundsätzlicher Bedeutung zuzulassen.
§ 113 Abs. 2 SPersVG
Serves as the primary procedural basis for admitting the appeal on points of law regarding state civil service disputes.
§ 72 Abs. 2 Nr. 1, § 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2 ArbGG
Provides the specific legal grounds and conditions for the admissibility of the appeal due to a question of fundamental significance.
KI-generiert
6 PB 41/13
Standing and legal interest of works council members to challenge resolution after irreversibly executed personnel measure
2 B 40/12
Analogous application of regional personnel committee participation rules to civil service appointments and their impact on grounds for nullity and revocation
5 PB 9/16, 5 PB 9/16 (5 P 3/17)
Personnel council participation rights in determining limited serviceability and reducing working hours under § 68(1) no. 6 PersVG BB
6 P 4/10
Works council participation rights for inter-departmental transfer of personnel powers as a general regulation under § 75 NdsPersVG and resulting claim for revocation
7 ABR 65/10
Inclusion of public-sector employees assigned to private enterprises in works council size and exemption thresholds under § 5 Abs. 1 Satz 3 BetrVG

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
§ 113 Abs. 2 SPersVG

Serves as the primary procedural basis for admitting the appeal on points of law regarding state civil service disputes.

§ 72 Abs. 2 Nr. 1, § 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2 ArbGG

Provides the specific legal grounds and conditions for the admissibility of the appeal due to a question of fundamental significance.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Zulassung der Rechtsbeschwerde; Wirkung der Entscheidung der Einigungsstelle über Maßnahme im Sinne des § 80 Abs. 1 Buchst. b Nr. 1 PersVG SL 1973

[GRUENDE]

Die Rechtsbeschwerde des Beteiligten zu 1 ist gemäß § 113 Abs. 2 SPersVG i.V.m. § 72 Abs. 2 Nr. 1, § 92 Abs. 1 Satz 2 ArbGG wegen einer entscheidungserheblichen Rechtsfrage von grundsätzlicher Bedeutung zuzulassen.

Die vorliegende Rechtssache kann dem Senat Gelegenheit zur Klärung der Frage geben, welche Wirkung der Entscheidung der Einigungsstelle über die personelle Maßnahme der Einstellung von Arbeitnehmern im Sinne des § 80 Abs. 1 Buchst. b Nr. 1 SPersVG zukommt, wenn der von einer solchen Entscheidung betroffene Arbeitnehmer in seiner Tätigkeit keine hoheitlichen Befugnisse ausübt.