Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
4 B 47/15, 4 B 47/15 (4 C 9/17) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2017:201217B4B47.15.0 KI-generiert

Compensation for mining property restrictions imposed by nature conservation regulations

Geschäftsnummer 4 B 47/15, 4 B 47/15 (4 C 9/17)
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Deutschland (DE)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) granted leave to appeal for the plaintiff in a dispute concerning the appropriate monetary compensation for restrictions on mining property rights imposed by a nature conservation area regulation. The court found the complaint against the lower court's denial of admission to be well-founded, ordering that the case proceed to the full revision proceedings on the merits, where the core legal question is under what federal law conditions such conservation-based limitations to mining ownership necessitate adequate financial compensation. The decisive legal basis for this procedural decision is § 132(2)(1) of the Administrative Court Procedure Act (VwGO), which permits admission where the case contributes to the further clarification of a significant legal issue, specifically the interplay between mining property rights and statutory nature conservation protections.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG; Compensation for mining property restrictions imposed by nature conservation regulations: The court found the complaint against the lower court's denial of admission to be well-founded, ordering that the case proceed to the full revision proceedings on the merits, where the core legal question is under what federal law conditions such conservation-based limitations to mining ownership necessitate adequate financial compensation. The decisive legal basis for this procedural decision is § 132(2)(1) of the Administrative Court Procedure Act (VwGO), which permits admission where the case contributes to the further clarification of a significant legal issue, specifically the interplay between mining property rights and statutory nature conservation protections.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
naturschutzrechtliche Bewilligung Revisionsgründe Eigentumsbeschränkung gesetzliche Voraussetzungen Verfahrensbeschränkungen Verwaltungsbeschwerde

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for granting leave to appeal the denial of leave to file a revision, based on the significance of the legal question.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Cost-related provision cited in the final order regarding the provisional determination of the amount in dispute.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Provisional statutory basis for the determination of the amount in dispute (Streitwert) for the revision proceedings.
§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG
Procedural provision cited in conjunction with the provisional fixation of the amount in dispute.
KI-generiert
4 C 9/17
Compensability of unconstitutional deprivation of mining property rights due to nature conservation restrictions
10 BN 3/23
Challenge to nature reserve ordinance restricting mining via Natura 2000 implementation and property proportionality
7 B 43/15
Mining plan approval in prohibited forest: binding nature of specific sectoral laws and exclusion of cumulative public interest balancing under § 48 BBergG
10 B 9/24, 10 B 9/24 (10 C 6/24)
Revision admission on destruction and compensation of natural retention areas under Water Management Act
7 B 68/11
Mining Plan Approval and FFH Site Boundary Exclusion Under German Mining and EU Habitats Regulations

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for granting leave to appeal the denial of leave to file a revision, based on the significance of the legal question.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Provisional statutory basis for the determination of the amount in dispute (Streitwert) for the revision proceedings.

§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG

Procedural provision cited in conjunction with the provisional fixation of the amount in dispute.

§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Cost-related provision cited in the final order regarding the provisional determination of the amount in dispute.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Revisionszulassung; angemessene Entschädigung für Einschränkung von Bergwerkeigentum aufgrund von Naturschutzgebietsverordnung

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde ist begründet. Die Revision ist nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zuzulassen. Das Revisionsverfahren kann zur weiteren Klärung der Frage beitragen, unter welchen Voraussetzungen für Beschränkungen des Bergwerkseigentums, die sich auf Grund einer Naturschutzgebietsverordnung ergeben, eine angemessene Entschädigung in Geld bundesrechtlich geboten ist.

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.