Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
1 B 1/17, 1 B 1/17 (1 C 21/17) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2017:010817B1B1.17.0 KI-generiert

Legal Consequences of a Statutory Entry and Residence Ban Lacking a Mandatory Duration Limit in Violation of Union Law

Geschäftsnummer 1 B 1/17, 1 B 1/17 (1 C 21/17)
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Deutschland (DE)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) allowed the appeal (Revision) to be filed, ruling in favor of the plaintiffs and finding their complaint both admissible and well-founded. The dispute concerned the legal consequences of a statutory entry and residence ban that was deemed contrary to EU law because it lacked a fixed term. The court ordered the admission of the appeal on the grounds of fundamental legal significance under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, citing the need to clarify the specific legal effects resulting from the unenforceability of such a ban due to its failure to include a mandatory duration limit in accordance with Union law.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; Legal Consequences of a Statutory Entry and Residence Ban Lacking a Mandatory Duration Limit in Violation of Union Law: The dispute concerned the legal consequences of a statutory entry and residence ban that was deemed contrary to EU law because it lacked a fixed term. The court ordered the admission of the appeal on the grounds of fundamental legal significance under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, citing the need to clarify the specific legal effects resulting from the unenforceability of such a ban due to its failure to include a mandatory duration limit in accordance with Union law.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Einreiseverbot gesetzliche Grenzen Mindestaufenthalt Wirkungen des Urteils Verwaltungsbeschwerde Klagefrist

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Ground for allowing the revision due to the fundamental legal significance of the case.
KI-generiert
1 B 2/23
Duration of entry and residence ban: no revision for divergence from superseded case law or unresolved question of fundamental significance
1 C 18/14
Determination of time limits for entry bans against EU citizens under § 7 FreizügG/EU based on current risk prognosis
1 C 46/20
Duration of Entry Ban: Exclusion of Incomplete Vocational Training and Language Skills as Justification for Reduced Ban Period
1 B 13/10
Consequences of unlawful administrative action: Limits of the claim for removal of consequences versus a claim for creation of a hypothetical legal position in residence permit disputes
XIII ZB 81/20
Insufficiency of Duration Justification in Detention for Purpose of Enforcement of Removal Order

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Ground for allowing the revision due to the fundamental legal significance of the case.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Revisionszulassung; Rechtsfolgen eines mangels Befristung unionsrechtswidrigen gesetzlichen Einreise- und Aufenthaltsverbots

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde der Kläger ist zulässig und begründet.

Die Revision ist wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zuzulassen. Sie kann dem Senat insbesondere Gelegenheit zur weiteren Klärung der Rechtsfolgen eines mangels Befristung unionsrechtswidrigen gesetzlichen Einreise- und Aufenthaltsverbots geben.