Tension between planning maintenance obligations for completed projects and individual claims under § 4 Abs. 1 Satz 1 UmwRG
Deutschland (DE)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Federal Administrative Court granted the complaint against the lower court's refusal to allow the appeal, thereby admitting revision on grounds of fundamental legal significance, and set the value in dispute for the ensuing proceedings. The case concerns a dispute under environmental protection law regarding the relationship between planning maintenance requirements for an already completed, project-approved undertaking and the individual rights asserted under § 4(1) Sentence 1 of the Environmental Impact Assessment Act (UmwRG). The decisive legal basis involves the admissibility of revision under § 132(1) and § 132(2) No. 1 of the Administrative Court Procedure Act (VwGO), focusing on whether the revision can clarify the interaction between planning law maintenance provisions and statutory environmental protection claims.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiert§ 133 Abs. 1 VwGO, § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 132 Abs. 1 VwGO, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG; Tension between planning maintenance obligations for completed projects and individual claims under § 4 Abs. 1 Satz 1 UmwRG: The case concerns a dispute under environmental protection law regarding the relationship between planning maintenance requirements for an already completed, project-approved undertaking and the individual rights asserted under § 4(1) Sentence 1 of the Environmental Impact Assessment Act (UmwRG). The decisive legal basis involves the admissibility of revision under § 132(1) and § 132(2) No. 1 of the Administrative Court Procedure Act (VwGO), focusing on whether the revision can clarify the interaction between planning law maintenance provisions and statutory environmental protection claims.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertProcedural basis cited in the operative order to establish the admissibility of the complaint challenging the refusal of leave to appeal.
Procedural basis cited in the operative order to establish the admissibility of the complaint challenging the refusal of leave to appeal.
Substantive legal ground cited in the operative order for granting leave to appeal on the basis of the fundamental significance of the legal issue.
Provision cited for the calculation of the value in dispute for the revision proceedings.
Provision cited for the calculation of the value in dispute for the revision proceedings.
Provision cited for the calculation of the value in dispute for the revision proceedings.
Volltext
Revisionszulassung; Grundsatz der Planerhaltung bei bereits errichtetem Vorhaben
[GRUENDE]
Die nach § 132 Abs. 1, § 133 Abs. 1 VwGO zulässige Beschwerde ist begründet. Die Revision ist wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zuzulassen. Das Revisionsverfahren kann voraussichtlich zur Klärung der Frage beitragen, in welchem Verhältnis die planfeststellungsrechtlichen Vorschriften über die Planerhaltung zu dem Anspruch aus § 4 Abs. 1 Satz 1 UmwRG stehen, wenn das planfestgestellte Vorhaben bereits errichtet ist.
Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.