Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
8 B 42/16, 8 B 42/16 (8 C 3/17) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2017:230117B8B42.16.0 KI-generiert

Entitlement to shareholdings in companies located outside the accession area under German property restitution law

Geschäftsnummer 8 B 42/16, 8 B 42/16 (8 C 3/17)
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Deutschland (DE)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Federal Administrative Court granted the defendant's complaint for leave to appeal, ruling that the higher court appeal is admissible based on fundamental legal significance, thereby allowing the case to proceed to the full appellate court. The dispute concerns a claim for an entitlement to shareholdings in companies, specifically challenging whether such an entitlement can be established for entities that were located outside the area of accession at the time of the damage under German property restitution law. The decision relies on §§ 1(6) and 3(1) sentence 4 second half-sentence of the Property Reconstruction Act (VermG), determining that the question of the temporal and geographic scope of restitution rights regarding post-accession shareholdings requires clarification by the Federal Administrative Court.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 GKG, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG; Entitlement to shareholdings in companies located outside the accession area under German property restitution law: The dispute concerns a claim for an entitlement to shareholdings in companies, specifically challenging whether such an entitlement can be established for entities that were located outside the area of accession at the time of the damage under German property restitution law. The decision relies on §§ 1(6) and 3(1) sentence 4 second half-sentence of the Property Reconstruction Act (VermG), determining that the question of the temporal and geographic scope of restitution rights regarding post-accession shareholdings requires clarification by the Federal Administrative Court.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Rückerstattung des Eigentums Eigentumsrecht juristische Person Entschädigungsberechtigung Ausdehnung der Enteignung Verwaltungsbeschwerde

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Cited as the main ground for allowing the appeal due to fundamental significance.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Cited as the legal basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the appellate proceedings.
§ 47 Abs. 1 GKG
Cited as the legal basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the appellate proceedings.
§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG
Cited as the legal basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the appellate proceedings.
KI-generiert

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Cited as the main ground for allowing the appeal due to fundamental significance.

§ 47 Abs. 1 GKG

Cited as the legal basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the appellate proceedings.

§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG

Cited as the legal basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the appellate proceedings.

§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Cited as the legal basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the appellate proceedings.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Revisionszulassung; Berechtigung für Beteiligungen an Unternehmen

[GRUENDE]

Die zulässige Beschwerde der Beklagten ist begründet. Die Revision ist gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung zuzulassen. Das Revisionsverfahren bietet voraussichtlich Gelegenheit zu klären, ob auf der Grundlage von § 1 Abs. 6, § 3 Abs. 1 Satz 4 Halbs. 2 VermG die Berechtigung für Beteiligungen an Unternehmen festgestellt werden kann, die zum Zeitpunkt der Schädigung ihren Sitz außerhalb des Beitrittsgebiets hatten.

Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.