Financing overview relevance for achievement of redevelopment goals under § 149 BauGB
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Federal Administrative Court granted leave to appeal, ruling in favor of the complainant and finding that the prior lower court's refusal was erroneous; consequently, the revision proceedings are now admissible. The case involves a dispute over urban planning law, specifically challenging the approval of a redevelopment statute and the legal significance of a cost and financing overview regarding the achievability of redevelopment goals. The decisive legal basis is the fundamental significance of the issue for the interpretation of § 149 of the German Building Code (BauGB) within the framework of §§ 136 and 142 BauGB, as assessed under §§ 132 and 133 of the Administrative Court Procedure Act (VwGO), which permits revision to clarify the land-law relevance of financing documents in such statutory contexts.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiert§ 149 BauGB, § 133 Abs. 1 VwGO, § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 132 Abs. 1 VwGO, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG; Financing overview relevance for achievement of redevelopment goals under § 149 BauGB: The case involves a dispute over urban planning law, specifically challenging the approval of a redevelopment statute and the legal significance of a cost and financing overview regarding the achievability of redevelopment goals. The decisive legal basis is the fundamental significance of the issue for the interpretation of § 149 of the German Building Code (BauGB) within the framework of §§ 136 and 142 BauGB, as assessed under §§ 132 and 133 of the Administrative Court Procedure Act (VwGO), which permits revision to clarify the land-law relevance of financing documents in such statutory contexts.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertCited in the dispositive as the procedural basis establishing the admissibility of the complaint against the refusal to grant leave to appeal.
Cited in the dispositive as the procedural basis for the court's decision to grant leave to appeal.
Cited in the dispositive as the primary ground for granting leave to appeal due to the fundamental significance of the legal issue.
Cited in the dispositive as the basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for costs.
Cited in the dispositive as the basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for costs.
Cited in the dispositive as the basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for costs.
Volltext
Revisionszulassung; Finanzierbarkeit eines Sanierungsziels (§ 149 BauGB)
[GRUENDE]
Die gemäß § 132 Abs. 1, § 133 Abs. 1 VwGO zulässige Beschwerde ist begründet. Die Revision ist wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache nach § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zuzulassen. Das Revisionsverfahren kann insbesondere zur Klärung der Frage beitragen, welche bodenrechtliche Relevanz einer Kosten- und Finanzierungsübersicht im Sinne von § 149 BauGB bei der Beschlussfassung über eine Sanierungssatzung (§§ 136, 142 BauGB) hinsichtlich der Frage der Finanzierbarkeit des Sanierungsziels zukommt.
Die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 1 und § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.