Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
7 B 20/14, 7 B 20/14 (7 C 2/15) ECLI:DE:BVerwG:2015:280115B7B20.14.0 KI-generiert

Admissibility of revision on the exclusion grounds and scope of application of the Freedom of Information Act (IFG)

Geschäftsnummer 7 B 20/14, 7 B 20/14 (7 C 2/15)
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Deutschland (DE)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Federal Administrative Court granted the defendant's complaint, overturning the lower court's refusal to admit an appeal (Revision), thereby allowing the case to proceed to the appellate level. The dispute concerned a lawsuit under the Freedom of Information Act (IFG), specifically challenging the applicability of exclusion grounds and the scope of the law's informational duties. The Court determined that the case possessed fundamental legal significance pursuant to § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO because it would provide an opportunity to clarify the prerequisites for the exclusion grounds under §§ 5 and 6 IFG and the scope of application of § 7 Abs. 2 Satz 1 IFG.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 52 Abs. 2 GKG, § 63 Abs. 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 3 GKG; Admissibility of revision on the exclusion grounds and scope of application of the Freedom of Information Act (IFG): The dispute concerned a lawsuit under the Freedom of Information Act (IFG), specifically challenging the applicability of exclusion grounds and the scope of the law's informational duties. The Court determined that the case possessed fundamental legal significance pursuant to § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO because it would provide an opportunity to clarify the prerequisites for the exclusion grounds under §§ 5 and 6 IFG and the scope of application of § 7 Abs. 2 Satz 1 IFG.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Informationsfreiheit Revisionsgründe Verfahrensvorschriften Ausschlusskriterien Verwaltungsbeschwerde Rechtsstaat

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for granting the complaint as the case has fundamental legal significance.
§ 52 Abs. 2 GKG
Procedural rule applied for the determination of the amount in dispute in both the complaint and revision proceedings.
§ 63 Abs. 1 GKG
Basis for the determination of the amount in dispute in the revision proceedings.
§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Basis for the determination of the amount in dispute in the complaint proceedings.
§ 47 Abs. 3 GKG
Procedural rule applied for the determination of the amount in dispute in the complaint proceedings.
KI-generiert
7 B 29/18, 7 B 29/18 (7 C 5/19)
Admissibility of appeal based on fundamental significance of determining when Freedom of Information Act requests constitute abuse of rights
7 B 6/17, 7 B 6/17 (7 C 29/17)
Scope of exclusion grounds and requirement of a final administrative act for free access to information under VIG
1 B 58/16, 1 B 58/16 (1 C 18/16)
Admissibility of Revision: Interpreting Interplay Between §§ 26a and 27a AsylG
7 B 5/18
Freedom of information access to litigation documents and procedural error in fact-finding based on file cross-references
IX B 67/12
Scope of right to inspect court files and admissibility of revision based on mere disagreement with factual assessment

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for granting the complaint as the case has fundamental legal significance.

§ 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Basis for the determination of the amount in dispute in the complaint proceedings.

§ 47 Abs. 3 GKG

Procedural rule applied for the determination of the amount in dispute in the complaint proceedings.

§ 52 Abs. 2 GKG

Procedural rule applied for the determination of the amount in dispute in both the complaint and revision proceedings.

§ 63 Abs. 1 GKG

Basis for the determination of the amount in dispute in the revision proceedings.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Revisionszulassung; Ausschlussgründe und Anwendungsbereich des IFG

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde der Beklagten gegen die Nichtzulassung der Revision in dem angefochtenen Urteil ist begründet. Die Rechtssache hat grundsätzliche Bedeutung im Sinne des § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO.

Das Revisionsverfahren kann dem Senat voraussichtlich Gelegenheit geben, sich zu den Voraussetzungen der Ausschlussgründe nach den §§ 5, 6 IFG und zum Anwendungsbereich des § 7 Abs. 2 Satz 1 IFG zu verhalten.

Die Festsetzung des Streitwerts beruht für das Beschwerdeverfahren auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1 und Abs. 3, § 52 Abs. 2 GKG, für das Revisionsverfahren auf § 47 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 52 Abs. 2, § 63 Abs. 1 GKG.