Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
2 BvR 931/25 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2025:rk20250707.2bvr093125 KI-generiert

Constitutional complaint: refusal of acceptance without reasoning and mootness of interim relief application

Geschäftsnummer 2 BvR 931/25
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Deutschland (DE)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Nichteintreten / Unzulässig (Inadmissible)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Federal Constitutional Court declined to accept the constitutional complaint for decision, rendering the applicant unsuccessful and leaving the underlying judgment in force; the pending application for interim relief was deemed moot as a result. The case involved a constitutional complaint challenging an inferior court decision, which the Second Senate’s Second Chamber dismissed without providing substantive reasoning in accordance with its discretionary power. The operative legal basis is § 93c of the Federal Constitutional Court Act, which permits the Chamber to refuse to hear a case without specifying reasons if it does not satisfy the requirements of admissibility or prospects of success, and § 40(3) of the Rules of Procedure, which automatically renders interim orders moot upon a final non-acceptance decision.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

§ 40 Abs. 3 GOBVerfG; Constitutional complaint: refusal of acceptance without reasoning and mootness of interim relief application: The case involved a constitutional complaint challenging an inferior court decision, which the Second Senate’s Second Chamber dismissed without providing substantive reasoning in accordance with its discretionary power. The operative legal basis is § 93c of the Federal Constitutional Court Act, which permits the Chamber to refuse to hear a case without specifying reasons if it does not satisfy the requirements of admissibility or prospects of success, and § 40(3) of the Rules of Procedure, which automatically renders interim orders moot upon a final non-acceptance decision.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
verfassungsmässige Anforderung Vorläufiger Rechtsschutz Rüge verfassungsmässiger Rechte Geschäftsordnung Begründung in der Sache Eilvorabentscheidungsverfahren

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
§ 40 Abs. 3 GOBVerfG
Procedural rule applied to determine that the application for interim relief became moot as a consequence of the constitutional complaint not being accepted for decision.
KI-generiert

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
§ 40 Abs. 3 GOBVerfG

Procedural rule applied to determine that the application for interim relief became moot as a consequence of the constitutional complaint not being accepted for decision.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Nichtannahmebeschluss ohne Begründung

[TENOR]

Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen.

Mit der Nichtannahme der Verfassungsbeschwerde wird der Antrag auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung gegenstandslos (§ 40 Abs. 3 GOBVerfG).

[GRUENDE]

Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.