Wahlprüfungsbeschwerde; a-limine Verwerfung unter Verweis auf Berichterstatterschreiben nach § 24 Satz 2 BVerfGG

The Federal Constitutional Court dismissed an electoral scrutiny complaint and denied the applicant’s request for reimbursement of necessary expenses. The dispute concerned a challenge to the validity of an electoral result, wherein the complainant sought review but failed to provide arguments sufficient to overturn the assessment previously detailed in the reporter’s letter of July 13, 2024. The Court relied on § 24(2) of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG) to waive a further substantive legal justification, referring to the prior written opinion for the underlying reasons for rejection. Additionally, the application for cost reimbursement was rejected under § 34a(3) BVerfGG because the statutory prerequisites for such compensation were not met, resulting in the complainant’s complete loss in the proceeding.