Interim injunction in immigration proceedings: statutory omission of reasoning under § 32 Abs. 5 BVerfGG

The Federal Constitutional Court’s Second Senate, Second Chamber, dismissed the application for a temporary injunction (einstweilige Anordnung) without providing a substantive reasoning in the operative order, thereby upholding the status quo for the opposing party. The case involved an immigration law matter (ausländerrechtliche Sache) where the applicant sought urgent interim protection against a measure from prior proceedings. The decision was issued as a final, unchallengeable order, and in accordance with § 32 Abs. 5 S. 1 BVerfGG, the Court stated that a separate, detailed written justification for the dismissal would be transmitted to the parties.