Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
2 BvC 10/21 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2021:cs20210722.2bvc001021 KI-generiert

Constitutional non-recognition complaint: inadmissibility of interim relief and unreasoned pre-notification under § 96d BVerfGG

Geschäftsnummer 2 BvC 10/21
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Deutschland (DE)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Federal Constitutional Court rejected the non-recognition complaint and declared the application for interim relief inadmissible, with the reasoning to be communicated separately. The case involved a non-recognition complaint filed under § 13 No. 3a of the Federal Constitutional Court Act, challenging a lower court's denial of legal standing or recognition in a constitutional dispute, alongside a request for an interim order. The decisive legal basis comprised the Court's jurisdictional authority under Article 93(1) No. 4c of the Basic Law, its power to dismiss complaints without prior reasoning under § 96d Sentence 2 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act, and the finding that the application for interim measures was procedurally inadmissible.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

§ 96d Satz 2 BVerfGG; Constitutional non-recognition complaint: inadmissibility of interim relief and unreasoned pre-notification under § 96d BVerfGG: The case involved a non-recognition complaint filed under § 13 No. 3a of the Federal Constitutional Court Act, challenging a lower court's denial of legal standing or recognition in a constitutional dispute, alongside a request for an interim order. The decisive legal basis comprised the Court's jurisdictional authority under Article 93(1) No. 4c of the Basic Law, its power to dismiss complaints without prior reasoning under § 96d Sentence 2 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act, and the finding that the application for interim measures was procedurally inadmissible.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Vorläufiger Rechtsschutz ungenügende Substantiierung von Grundrechtsverletzungen prozessleitende Verfügungen Anerkennung als Staat Eröffnung des Entscheids Verfassungsmäßigkeit der Gesetze

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
§ 96d Satz 2 BVerfGG
Procedural rule cited in the dispositive to justify the communication of the decision without a written reasoning.
KI-generiert
2 BvR 991/18
Inadmissibility of constitutional complaint for interim relief due to failure to request suspension of effect in administrative proceedings
2 BvQ 31/17
Denial of interim relief where underlying constitutional complaint is inadmissible due to unexhausted ordinary judicial remedies
2 BvC 2/21
Inadmissibility of non-recognition complaint due to failure to meet pleading requirements and inability to cure pre-deadline defects in party recognition.
1 BvQ 4/17
Inadmissibility of objection to interim relief denial where only a constitutional complaint is admissible in the main proceedings
1 BvQ 85/23
Inadmissibility of interim constitutional relief for failure to substantiate the main complaint and submit challenged decisions

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
§ 96d Satz 2 BVerfGG

Procedural rule cited in the dispositive to justify the communication of the decision without a written reasoning.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Zurückweisung einer Nichtanerkennungsbeschwerde (Art 93 Abs 1 Nr 4c GG, § 13 Nr 3a BVerfGG) - Vorabmitteilung der Entscheidung ohne Begründung (§ 96d S 2 BVerfGG) - Eilantrag unstatthaft

[TENOR]

Die Nichtanerkennungsbeschwerde wird zurückgewiesen.

Der Antrag auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung ist unstatthaft.

Die Begründung wird gesondert übermittelt (§ 96d Satz 2 BVerfGG).