Constitutional complaint against assembly ban; insufficient substantiation of urgent interim relief requirements

The Federal Constitutional Court denied the applicant's urgent application for an interim order, meaning the challenged assembly ban remains in force and the applicant prevailed in no respect. The dispute concerned a request for urgent relief to annul a prohibition of a public assembly, where the applicant sought to halt the ban's enforcement pending a final decision. The court rejected the motion solely on procedural grounds, holding that the applicant failed to adequately substantiate the prerequisites for an interim order as required by § 32 Abs. 1 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG), rendering the decision final and unappealable.