Election scrutiny complaint dismissed due to insufficiently identified recusal motion against unnamed judges

The Federal Constitutional Court rejected the petition for recusal of specific judges as manifestly inadmissible and dismissed the election scrutiny complaint. The dispute involved a challenge to the validity of an election and a motion for recusal, which was deemed procedurally deficient because the applicants failed to designate the judges by name or provide sufficient clarity in their reasoning. Under the applicable procedural doctrine, the lack of specific identification rendered the recusal motion inadmissible, while the constitutional court declined to provide further grounds for dismissing the election scrutiny complaint, citing the reasons already established in the rapporteur's preliminary report and relying on the provision that permits dispensing with a detailed justification for unmerited complaints.