Valuation of constitutional complaint proceedings: determining matter value based on objective significance of the case and legal representation.
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe German Federal Constitutional Court set the matter value (Gegenstandswert) for the attorney's fees at €230,000, thereby establishing the financial scope for the representation in the case. The dispute concerned a constitutional complaint, with the court focusing on the determination of the fee basis rather than the substantive merits of the underlying constitutional claim. Relying on the objective significance of the proceedings and the principle that such proceedings are fostered by legal professional activity, the Court applied established fee assessment doctrines to justify the high valuation, ensuring the calculation reflects the complexity and importance of the constitutional litigation.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertBVerfGE 79, 365; Valuation of constitutional complaint proceedings: determining matter value based on objective significance of the case and legal representation: The dispute concerned a constitutional complaint, with the court focusing on the determination of the fee basis rather than the substantive merits of the underlying constitutional claim. Relying on the objective significance of the proceedings and the principle that such proceedings are fostered by legal professional activity, the Court applied established fee assessment doctrines to justify the high valuation, ensuring the calculation reflects the complexity and importance of the constitutional litigation.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertCited in the dispositive to justify the determination of the matter value based on the objective significance of the proceedings and the promotion of the case by legal professional activity.
Volltext
Gegenstandswertfestsetzung im Verfassungsbeschwerdeverfahren
[TENOR]
Unter Berücksichtigung der hohen objektiven Bedeutung des Verfahrens und seiner Förderung durch die anwaltliche Tätigkeit (vgl. BVerfGE 79, 365 ) wird der Gegenstandswert auf 230.000 Euro (in Worten: zweihundertdreißigtausend Euro) festgesetzt.