Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
1 BvR 2896/17 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2020:rk20200212.1bvr289617 KI-generiert

Correction of scrivener's error in constitutional complaint non-acceptance order under § 118 VwGO and § 319 ZPO

Geschäftsnummer 1 BvR 2896/17
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Deutschland (DE)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Federal Constitutional Court ordered a correction to the operative part (Tenor) of its prior non-acceptance decision dated January 29, 2018, effectively upholding the original non-acceptance of the constitutional complaint while fixing a drafting error. The dispute arose from a scrivener's error in the referenced provision, where "Satz 3" (Sentence 3) was erroneously cited instead of "Satz 4" (Sentence 4) on page 2, line 8 of the original order. Relying on the corresponding application of § 118(1) of the Code of Administrative Court Procedure (VwGO) and § 319(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO), the Court authorized the correction after hearing the complainant, with the amended decision being final and unappealable.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

§ 118 Abs. 1 VwGO, § 319 Abs. 1 ZPO; Correction of scrivener's error in constitutional complaint non-acceptance order under § 118 VwGO and § 319 ZPO: The dispute arose from a scrivener's error in the referenced provision, where "Satz 3" (Sentence 3) was erroneously cited instead of "Satz 4" (Sentence 4) on page 2, line 8 of the original order. Relying on the corresponding application of § 118(1) of the Code of Administrative Court Procedure (VwGO) and § 319(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO), the Court authorized the correction after hearing the complainant, with the amended decision being final and unappealable.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Kanzleiversehen nicht-administrative Streitigkeit Dispositiv Zivilprozessordnung Rüge verfassungsmässiger Rechte Revision eines Entscheids

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
§ 118 Abs. 1 VwGO
Procedural rule applied in the dispositive to authorize the correction of a writing error in the operative part of the previous decision.
§ 319 Abs. 1 ZPO
Procedural rule applied in the dispositive, in corresponding application, to authorize the correction of a writing error in the operative part of the previous decision.
KI-generiert
2 BvR 1550/17
Correction of clerical errors in the reasoning of a non-acceptance decision
1 BvR 2485/12
Correction of a clerical error in a prior chamber decision replacing an incorrect Federal Administrative Court case number
1 BvR 1655/21
Correction of clerical error in prior chamber decision
1 BvR 125/22
Corrections to apparent clerical errors in a prior judicial decision
2 BvR 1057/22
Ex officio correction of factual inaccuracy in prior favorable chamber decision regarding non-executed procedural order

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
§ 118 Abs. 1 VwGO

Procedural rule applied in the dispositive to authorize the correction of a writing error in the operative part of the previous decision.

§ 319 Abs. 1 ZPO

Procedural rule applied in the dispositive, in corresponding application, to authorize the correction of a writing error in the operative part of the previous decision.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Berichtigung eines Schreibversehens im Tenor eines Nichtannahmebeschlusses

[TENOR]

Der Beschluss über die Nichtannahme der Verfassungsbeschwerde vom 29. Januar 2018 wird nach Anhörung der Beschwerdeführerin in entsprechender Anwendung von § 118 Abs. 1 VwGO und § 319 Abs. 1 ZPO dahingehend berichtigt, dass auf Seite 2 in Zeile 8 die Worte "Satz 3" durch die Worte "Satz 4" ersetzt werden.

[GRUENDE]

Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.