Constitutional complaint against refusal of deadline reinstatement; dispensation from statement of reasons under § 93d BVerfGG

The Federal Constitutional Court refused to accept the constitutional complaint for a decision without entering into the merits of the accompanying motion for reinstatement of the deadline, rendering the decision unchallengeable. The case involved a procedural constitutional complaint where the complainant challenged a lower court’s procedural handling, specifically seeking relief from a missed deadline through a motion for reinstatement. The Court applied § 93d(1) sentence 3 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG) to dispense with a written statement of reasons, thereby denying the relief sought by the applicant.