Wiedereinsetzung in den vorigen Stand at Federal Constitutional Court: insufficiency of mere request for medical records to prove lack of fault
Deutschland (DE)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Federal Constitutional Court dismissed the applicant's motion for reinstatement to the previous status and declined to accept the subsequent constitutional complaint for decision. The dispute concerned the applicant's failure to file the constitutional complaint within the one-month statutory deadline and their subsequent attempt to seek relief from this missed deadline by requesting the submission of their medical records rather than personally detailing the impediment. The decisive legal basis was § 93 Abs. 1 and 2 S. 1 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG), which mandates that a motion for reinstatement must include a self-standing and substantive explanation of the cause of the impediment and that it must be shown that the obstacle occurred without the applicant's fault; the mere request to refer to medical documents did not fulfill this expository requirement.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiert§ 93 Abs 2 S 1 BVerfGG, § 93 Absatz 1 BVerfGG; Wiedereinsetzung in den vorigen Stand at Federal Constitutional Court: insufficiency of mere request for medical records to prove lack of fault: The dispute concerned the applicant's failure to file the constitutional complaint within the one-month statutory deadline and their subsequent attempt to seek relief from this missed deadline by requesting the submission of their medical records rather than personally detailing the impediment. The decisive legal basis was § 93 Abs. 1 and 2 S. 1 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG), which mandates that a motion for reinstatement must include a self-standing and substantive explanation of the cause of the impediment and that it must be shown that the obstacle occurred without the applicant's fault; the mere request to refer to medical documents did not fulfill this expository requirement.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertCited as the procedural basis for the motion to restore the previous status, which was rejected because the applicant failed to demonstrate the necessary lack of fault.
Cited to identify the specific one-month filing deadline that the applicant failed to observe without fault.
Volltext
Nichtannahmebeschluss mit Tenorbegründung: Wiedereinsetzungsantrag (§ 93 Abs 2 S 1 BVerfGG) erfordert selbständige Darlegungen zum Verhinderungsgrund - Antrag auf Beziehung der Krankenakte des Beschwerdeführers nicht hinreichend
[TENOR]
1. Der Antrag auf Wiedereinsetzung in den vorigen Stand wird abgelehnt, da der Beschwerdeführer nicht dargelegt hat, dass er ohne Verschulden gehindert war, die Monatsfrist des § 93 Absatz 1 BVerfGG einzuhalten. Der Antrag, seine Krankenakte beizuziehen, entbindet den Beschwerdeführer nicht davon, einen Verhinderungsgrund selbstständig darzutun.
2. Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen.
[GRUENDE]
Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.