Recusal request against judges not assigned to the deciding chamber is moot; non-acceptance of constitutional complaint without further reasoning

The Federal Constitutional Court declined to accept the constitutional complaint for decision, rendering the ruling final and unappealable without further justification. The applicant had challenged a lower court decision and filed a recusal request against specific judges, but the application lacked legal merit regarding the court's composition. The Court held that the recusal request required no further examination because the judges targeted were not members of the chamber competent to decide the complaint, citing established case law on jurisdictional requirements. Additionally, the Court exercised its discretion under Section 93d(1) Sentence 3 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act to forgo a detailed substantive explanation, thereby leaving the challenged non-acceptance of the primary complaint intact.