Constitutional complaint rejected for lacking fundamental rights violation, centered on factual determination and burden of proof

The Federal Constitutional Court of Germany dismissed the constitutional complaint, rendering the decision final and unappealable, thereby allowing the lower court's ruling to stand. The dispute involved a challenge to a decision that the petitioner argued violated fundamental rights or rights equivalent to fundamental rights, but the court found no decisive constitutional violation. The rejection was based on the ground that the complaint lacked general constitutional significance under § 93a No. 2 lit. a of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG) and that a review was not indicated to enforce the petitioner's rights under § 90 No. 1 BVerfGG, as the arguments were determined to be primarily factual and related to evidence distribution and procedural law rather than constitutional matters. Consequently, the court dispensed with providing a detailed written reasoning in accordance with § 93d No. 1 Sentence 3 BVerfGG.