Non-admission of constitutional complaint without reasoning under § 93d BVerfGG
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Federal Constitutional Court of Germany did not admit the constitutional complaint for decision, rendering the challenge unsuccessful and leaving the lower court's decision in force; the court explicitly refrained from providing a reasoning for this non-acceptance under § 93d (1) sentence 3 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG). The dispute concerned a constitutional complaint filed with the First Senate's First Chamber, specifically identified by case number 1 BvR 161/17, challenging a prior judicial act without the specific subject matter detailed in the unexplained order. The decisive legal basis was the procedural authority to issue a non-admission order without grounds under § 93d BVerfGG, which renders the decision final and unappealable.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiert§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG; Non-admission of constitutional complaint without reasoning under § 93d BVerfGG: The dispute concerned a constitutional complaint filed with the First Senate's First Chamber, specifically identified by case number 1 BvR 161/17, challenging a prior judicial act without the specific subject matter detailed in the unexplained order. The decisive legal basis was the procedural authority to issue a non-admission order without grounds under § 93d BVerfGG, which renders the decision final and unappealable.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertProcedural basis cited in the dispositive to justify the omission of a reasoning for the non-admission of the constitutional complaint.
Volltext
Nichtannahmebeschluss ohne Begründung
[TENOR] Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen.
Von einer Begründung wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.
Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.