Inadmissibility of interim relief application for failure to meet statutory substantiation requirements

The Federal Constitutional Court dismissed the applicant's request for interim relief, leaving no prior order in force, as the application was deemed inadmissible. The dispute involved a request for urgent constitutional protection against a pending proceeding, but the applicant failed to substantiate the claim sufficiently. The Court held that the application violated the substantive reasoning requirements of § 23 Abs. 1 S. 2 BVerfGG, which apply equally to interim relief proceedings, resulting in a final, unappealable rejection of the motion.