Constitutional complaint against unreasoned non-acceptance; reliance on § 93d BVerfGG to dispense with written justification

The Federal Constitutional Court declined to accept the constitutional complaint for decision, rendering the applicant's request for interim relief without object, and dispensed with a written statement of reasons pursuant to § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG. The case involved a constitutional complaint challenging an underlying judicial decision, although the specific subject matter and prior instances are not detailed in the unreasoned chamber order. The decisive legal basis for the outcome was the chamber's determination that the matter did not warrant further review, resulting in an unchallengeable decision under § 40 Abs. 3 GOBVerfG.