Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
1 BvR 1387/17 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2017:rk20170630.1bvr138717 KI-generiert

Interim injunction for G20 protest camp: subsidiary nature of constitutional emergency relief and exclusive jurisdiction of specialized local courts for balancing demonstration rights against public interests

Geschäftsnummer 1 BvR 1387/17
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Deutschland (DE)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The German Federal Constitutional Court dismissed the application for the issuance of an interim injunction, denying the petitioners immediate relief. The dispute concerned a protest camp established in connection with a major international summit in Hamburg, where the applicants challenged measures taken against the camp, seeking to protect their right to demonstration against public interests. The court ruled on the basis of the subsidiarity principle regarding specialized emergency legal protection, holding that the balancing of the right to demonstrate with public interests is primarily the responsibility of specialized local instances rather than the constitutional court at this procedural stage.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Interim injunction for G20 protest camp: subsidiary nature of constitutional emergency relief and exclusive jurisdiction of specialized local courts for balancing demonstration rights against public interests: The dispute concerned a protest camp established in connection with a major international summit in Hamburg, where the applicants challenged measures taken against the camp, seeking to protect their right to demonstration against public interests. The court ruled on the basis of the subsidiarity principle regarding specialized emergency legal protection, holding that the balancing of the right to demonstrate with public interests is primarily the responsibility of specialized local instances rather than the constitutional court at this procedural stage.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Vorläufiger Rechtsschutz Demonstrationsrecht Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit Gesetzlicher Schutz Verfahrensrechte völkerrechtliche Verantwortlichkeit
KI-generiert

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Ablehnung des Erlasses einer weiteren eA bzgl eines Protestcamps anlässlich des G20-Gipfels in Hamburg: Subsidiarität gegenüber fachgerichtlichem Eilrechtsschutz - Ausgleich zwischen Demonstrationsfreiheit und öffentlichen Interessen obliegt in erster Linie fachnahen Instanzen vor Ort

[TENOR]

Der Antrag auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung wird abgelehnt.