Admissibility of constitutional complaint challenging parliamentary resolution for insufficient substantiation of fundamental rights infringement

The Federal Constitutional Court (Second Senate, First Chamber) refused to accept the constitutional complaint for decision, rendering the respondent the prevailing party and leaving the contested parliamentary resolution intact. The case involved a challenge to a non-binding resolution adopted by the German Bundestag concerning historical events in Armenia. The complaint was deemed inadmissible because the complainant failed to adequately demonstrate a violation of fundamental rights or rights equivalent to fundamental rights, and no such infringement was evident on the face of the record. The decisive legal basis was the requirement for a sufficient substantiation of an individual rights complaint under constitutional law, which the petitioner did not meet.