Recusal as abuse of right; dismissal of constitutional complaint without substantive review

The Federal Constitutional Court dismissed the applicant's constitutional complaint without further examination and rejected the associated motions for recusal of the Vizepräsident and two judges as inadmissible and abusive, leaving the underlying decision intact. The case involved a parallel constitutional complaint procedure where the applicant challenged specific judicial participation, which the court characterized as right-abuse (rechtsmissbräuchlich). The court relied on the power to dispense from a detailed reasoning under § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG, determining that the recusal requests were procedurally deficient and the complaint lacked the requisite admissibility criteria.