Constitutional court provisional injunction application rejected due to insufficient substantiation of non-obviousness of main complaint

The Federal Constitutional Court dismissed the applicant's motion for provisional relief, ruling in favor of the respondent state. The dispute involved a request for an interim injunction challenging a procedural decision, which the applicant failed to substantiate sufficiently to demonstrate that a potential main complaint would be admissible and not evidently unfounded. Applying the requirement that motions for provisional measures must be adequately substantiated to establish the prospect of success in the main proceedings, the Court rejected the application without examining the merits, thereby leaving the status quo intact.