Reinstatement in the former state rejected for missing the two-week filing deadline and failing to prove lack of fault regarding the original constitutional complaint deadline
Deutschland (DE)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Federal Constitutional Court dismissed the applicant’s motion for reinstatement, leaving the time-barred constitutional complaint inadmissible, as the motion itself failed to meet procedural requirements. The dispute concerned the applicant's failure to comply with the statutory deadline for filing a constitutional complaint, for which he subsequently sought relief from the consequences of delay. Under § 93 (1) and (2) sentence 2 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act, reinstatement requires the applicant to demonstrate both an absence of fault regarding the original missed deadline and the filing of the motion within two weeks of the removal of the impediment; the Court held that the applicant neither sufficiently substantiated a lack of fault nor filed the reinstatement request within the mandatory two-week window, rendering the application procedurally defective and unreviewable.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiert§ 93 Abs 1 BVerfGG, § 93 Abs. 2 Satz 2 BVerfGG; Reinstatement in the former state rejected for missing the two-week filing deadline and failing to prove lack of fault regarding the original constitutional complaint deadline: The dispute concerned the applicant's failure to comply with the statutory deadline for filing a constitutional complaint, for which he subsequently sought relief from the consequences of delay. Under § 93 (1) and (2) sentence 2 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act, reinstatement requires the applicant to demonstrate both an absence of fault regarding the original missed deadline and the filing of the motion within two weeks of the removal of the impediment; the Court held that the applicant neither sufficiently substantiated a lack of fault nor filed the reinstatement request within the mandatory two-week window, rendering the application procedurally defective and unreviewable.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertMain ground for dismissal because the motion for reinstatement was not filed within the mandatory two-week period after the impediment ceased.
Procedural requirement cited in the dispositive to reject the application due to the applicant's failure to demonstrate that the original statutory deadline was missed without fault.
Volltext
Versagung der Wiedereinsetzung in den vorigen Stand: Versäumung der Zweiwochenfrist des § 93 Abs 2 S 2 BVerfGG - mangelndes Verschulden an Versäumung der Frist des § 93 Abs 1 BVerfGG nicht dargelegt
[TENOR]
Der Antrag auf Wiedereinsetzung in den vorigen Stand wird abgelehnt, da er nicht gemäß § 93 Abs. 2 Satz 2 BVerfGG binnen zwei Wochen nach Wegfall des geltend gemachten Hindernisses gestellt worden ist. Zudem hat der Beschwerdeführer nicht ausreichend dargelegt, dass er ohne Verschulden an der Einhaltung der Frist des § 93 Abs. 1 BVerfGG gehindert war.
Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.