Denial of legal aid in constitutional complaint for lack of prospects of success due to failure to observe the principle of subsidiarity
Deutschland (DE)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Federal Constitutional Court dismissed the applicant's request for legal aid and the appointment of a lawyer, leaving the order unchallengeable. The dispute concerned a constitutional complaint against the initial rejection of legal aid, where the applicant sought representation in the constitutional proceedings. The Court held that the intended constitutional litigation lacked sufficient prospects of success under § 114 Abs. 1 Satz 1 ZPO because the applicant failed to satisfy the principle of subsidiarity, a mandatory precondition for admissible constitutional complaints.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiert§ 114 Abs. 1 Satz 1 ZPO; Denial of legal aid in constitutional complaint for lack of prospects of success due to failure to observe the principle of subsidiarity: The dispute concerned a constitutional complaint against the initial rejection of legal aid, where the applicant sought representation in the constitutional proceedings. The Court held that the intended constitutional litigation lacked sufficient prospects of success under § 114 Abs. 1 Satz 1 ZPO because the applicant failed to satisfy the principle of subsidiarity, a mandatory precondition for admissible constitutional complaints.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertBasis for the dismissal of the request for legal aid because the intended constitutional litigation lacks sufficient prospects of success due to non-compliance with the principle of subsidiarity.
Volltext
Versagung von PKH im Verfassungsbeschwerdeverfahren - mangelnde Erfolgsaussichten (§ 114 S 1 ZPO) wegen Subsidiarität
[TENOR]
Der Antrag auf Bewilligung von Prozesskostenhilfe und Beiordnung des Rechtsanwalts L. wird abgelehnt, weil die beabsichtigte Rechtsverfolgung mangels Wahrung des Subsidiaritätsgrundsatzes keine hinreichende Aussicht auf Erfolg bietet (§ 114 Abs. 1 Satz 1 ZPO).
Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.