Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
2 BvR 1390/12 KI-generiert

Necessity of issuing an enforcement order to implement prior constitutional court guidelines

Geschäftsnummer 2 BvR 1390/12
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Deutschland (DE)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Federal Constitutional Court denied the application for the issuance of an enforcement order, ruling that it was not evident that such an order was necessary to implement the guidelines established in the Court's prior judgment regarding the contested matter. The dispute concerned the procedural execution of a substantive constitutional ruling issued by the same Senate on September 12, 2012, specifically addressing the need for judicial compulsion to ensure compliance with the court's directives. The decisive legal basis was the discretion regarding the necessity of enforcement measures, concluding that the mere existence of a prior judgment did not automatically warrant an *Vollstreckungsanordnung* without a clear indication of non-compliance or the specific need for such coercive measures.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Necessity of issuing an enforcement order to implement prior constitutional court guidelines: The dispute concerned the procedural execution of a substantive constitutional ruling issued by the same Senate on September 12, 2012, specifically addressing the need for judicial compulsion to ensure compliance with the court's directives. The decisive legal basis was the discretion regarding the necessity of enforcement measures, concluding that the mere existence of a prior judgment did not automatically warrant an *Vollstreckungsanordnung* without a clear indication of non-compliance or the specific need for such coercive measures.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Zulassung der Zwangsvollstreckung verfassungsmässiger Grundsatz richterliches Ermessen Zwangsmassnahmen verfahrensrechtliche Fragen Streitgegenstand

Zitierte Rechtsprechung

KI-generiert
2 BvR 1421/12
Conditioning ratification of the ESM Treaty on international law declarations capping liability and guaranteeing parliamentary information rights
2 BvR 1438/12
Conditioning ratification of the ESM Treaty on international law declarations capping liability and guaranteeing parliamentary information rights
2 BvR 1439/12
Conditioning ratification of the ESM Treaty on international law declarations capping liability and guaranteeing parliamentary information rights
2 BvR 1440/12
Conditioning ratification of the ESM Treaty on international law declarations capping liability and guaranteeing parliamentary information rights
KI-generiert
2 BvQ 60/23
Federal constitutional interim order for civil enforcement halted by exhaustion requirement of ordinary court remedies
1 BvR 1819/15
Constitutional complaint against a parallel court decision declared inadmissible
2 BvR 1176/22
Isolated application for coercive enforcement of a prior Constitutional Court ruling; waiver of reasoned decision under § 24(2) BVerfGG
2 BvR 1021/12
Constitutional complaint against civil judgment: non-acceptance for lack of sufficient constitutional relevance
1 BvR 216/18
Constitutional complaint challenging refusal of effective legal remedy

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Ablehnung eines Antrags auf Erlass einer Vollstreckungsanordnung

[TENOR]

Eine Vollstreckungsanordnung wird nicht erlassen, da nicht zu erkennen ist, dass es zur Durchsetzung der im Urteil des Zweiten

Senats des Bundesverfassungsgerichts vom 12. September 2012 (2 BvE 6/12, 2 BvR 1390/12, 2 BvR 1421/12, 2 BvR 1438/12, 2 BvR

1439/12, 2 BvR 1440/12, EuGRZ 2012, S. 569 ff.) enthaltenen Vorgaben einer solchen Anordnung bedarf.