Constitutional challenge to Seventh Amendment of the Berlin Street Cleaning Act: Non-acceptance of complaint without reasoning under § 93d(1) sentence 3 BVerfGG
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Federal Constitutional Court (First Senate, First Chamber) declined to accept the constitutional complaint for a decision and dispensed with providing reasoning, rendering the ruling unappealable and leaving the underlying normative framework in force. The dispute concerned the constitutionality of the Seventh Amendment to the Berlin Street Cleaning Act, challenged via a constitutional complaint against the relevant legislative amendment. The procedural basis for this non-acceptance and the waiver of justification was § 93d(1) sentence 3 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG), which permits chambers to reject cases without detailed reasoning if they do not appear to offer prospects of success.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiert§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG; Constitutional challenge to Seventh Amendment of the Berlin Street Cleaning Act: Non-acceptance of complaint without reasoning under § 93d(1) sentence 3 BVerfGG: The dispute concerned the constitutionality of the Seventh Amendment to the Berlin Street Cleaning Act, challenged via a constitutional complaint against the relevant legislative amendment. The procedural basis for this non-acceptance and the waiver of justification was § 93d(1) sentence 3 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG), which permits chambers to reject cases without detailed reasoning if they do not appear to offer prospects of success.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertProcedural rule applied in the dispositive to justify the waiver of reasoning for the decision not to accept the constitutional complaint.
Volltext
Nichtannahmebeschluss ohne Begründung: Siebtes Gesetz zur Änderung des Straßenreinigungsgesetzes für Berlin
[TENOR] Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen.
Von einer Begründung wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.
Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.