Constitutional complaint: Non-acceptance due to parallel decision, waiving justification under § 93d BVerfGG

The Federal Constitutional Court declined to accept the constitutional complaint for decision, rendering the ruling unappealable and thereby leaving the underlying constitutional challenge unresolved at the constitutional level. The case involved a constitutional complaint filed against a procedural decision, but the Chamber noted that an identical matter was concurrently decided by a parallel ruling issued on the same date, necessitating this non-acceptance to avoid redundant adjudication. Under Section 93d Paragraph 1 Sentence 3 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act, the court waived providing a detailed substantive justification, relying instead on the reference to the companion decision to resolve the dispute.