Discretion to dispense with reasoning in constitutional complaint non-admission under § 93d BVerfGG

The Federal Constitutional Court refused to admit the constitutional complaint for a decision, rendering the order unappealable without further written reasoning pursuant to § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG, thereby allowing the underlying legal position to stand. The case concerned a request for review based on a parallel decision issued by the same chamber on the same day, implying a consistent procedural or substantive outcome across multiple complaints challenging the same underlying matter. The decisive legal basis was the discretion under § 93d of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG), which permits the court to dispense with an elaborate justification when the legal issues are identical to those already addressed in a concurrent ruling.