Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
2 BvE 2/09 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2012:es20120418.2bve000209 KI-generiert

Judge recusal in constitutional litigation: prior legislative participation in the same matter under § 18 Abs. 1 Nr. 2 BVerfGG

Geschäftsnummer 2 BvE 2/09
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Deutschland (DE)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Nichteintreten / Unzulässig (Inadmissible)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Federal Constitutional Court ordered the exclusion of a sitting judge from the exercise of his judicial duties due to a procedural conflict of interest. The dispute arose in an interstate litigation case where the Antragsgegnerin (respondent) was a specific legislative body, and it was established that the judge had previously served as a member of that same legislative body in two prior convenions while the specific matter at issue was pending, thereby having participated decisively in the underlying decisions. Applying § 18 (1) no. 2 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act, which prohibits judges from participating in a case where they have previously acted as a member of a legislative body on the same subject matter, the Court ruled that the judge must be recused to ensure procedural integrity.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

§ 18 Abs 1 Nr 2 BVerfGG; Judge recusal in constitutional litigation: prior legislative participation in the same matter under § 18 Abs. 1 Nr. 2 BVerfGG: The dispute arose in an interstate litigation case where the Antragsgegnerin (respondent) was a specific legislative body, and it was established that the judge had previously served as a member of that same legislative body in two prior convenions while the specific matter at issue was pending, thereby having participated decisively in the underlying decisions. Applying § 18 (1) no. 2 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act, which prohibits judges from participating in a case where they have previously acted as a member of a legislative body on the same subject matter, the Court ruled that the judge must be recused to ensure procedural integrity.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Interessenkollision Rechtsakt prozessleitende Verfügungen Ausstandsbegehren Trennungsklage Rüge verfassungsmässiger Rechte

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
KI-generiert

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
§ 18 Abs. 1 Nr. 2 BVerfGG

This provision serves as the main ground for the dispositive order, mandating the exclusion of the judge from the case because he previously participated in the same matter as a member of the respondent legislative bodies.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Ausschluss eines Bundesverfassungsrichters von der Mitwirkung an der Entscheidung im Organstreitverfahren - Tätigkeit in selber Sache (§ 18 Abs 1 Nr 2 BVerfGG) aufgrund Mitgliedschaft in 13. und 14. Bundesversammlung, die im vorliegenden Verfahren Antragsgegnerinnen sind

[TENOR]

Der Richter Müller ist von der Ausübung seines Richteramtes ausgeschlossen, weil er in derselben Sache vor seiner Ernennung

zum Richter des Bundesverfassungsgerichts als Mitglied der jeweiligen Antragsgegnerin zu 2. mitentscheidend tätig gewesen

ist (§ 18 Abs. 1 Nr. 2 BVerfGG).