Constitutional complaint rejected for lack of sufficient substantiation

The Federal Constitutional Court rejected the constitutional complaint as inadmissible without entering into the merits, ruling that the petition was not to be taken into decision for lack of sufficient substantiation. The dispute involved a constitutional complaint challenging a lower court decision, where the applicant failed to meet the requirement of providing a sufficiently detailed and reasoned explanation of the alleged violation of fundamental rights. The decisive legal basis is the doctrine of substantive admissibility under German constitutional procedural law, which mandates that a constitutional complaint must contain a specific and plausible substantiation of the constitutional right infringed and the manner of its infringement to be considered for a substantive review.