Gegenstandswert for attorney fees in constitutional complaint proceedings
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Federal Constitutional Court (First Senate, Second Chamber) fixed the matter value for attorney activity in a constitutional complaint proceedings at €8,000, a procedural determination with no substantive judgment on the merits of the underlying constitutional dispute. This administrative decision was issued in a *Verfassungsbeschwerde* (constitutional complaint) procedure where the court had to establish the financial value of the case for fee calculation purposes. The ruling applied § 37(2) sentence 2 in conjunction with § 14(1) of the Lawyers' Remuneration Act (RVG), citing the precedent in BVerfGE 79, 365, to formally set the *Gegenstandswert* (matter value) governing the legal costs associated with the case.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiert§ 14 Abs. 1 RVG, § 37 Abs. 2 Satz 2 i.V.m. § 14 Abs. 1 RVG; Gegenstandswert for attorney fees in constitutional complaint proceedings: This administrative decision was issued in a *Verfassungsbeschwerde* (constitutional complaint) procedure where the court had to establish the financial value of the case for fee calculation purposes. The ruling applied § 37(2) sentence 2 in conjunction with § 14(1) of the Lawyers' Remuneration Act (RVG), citing the precedent in BVerfGE 79, 365, to formally set the *Gegenstandswert* (matter value) governing the legal costs associated with the case.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertZitierte Rechtsprechung
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertLegal basis cited in the dispositive for fixing the matter value for attorney activity in constitutional complaint proceedings.
Volltext
Gegenstandswertfestsetzung im Verfassungsbeschwerdeverfahren
[TENOR]
Der Wert des Gegenstands der anwaltlichen Tätigkeit im Verfassungsbeschwerdeverfahren wird auf 8.000 € (in Worten: achttausend
Euro) festgesetzt (§ 37 Abs. 2 Satz 2 i.V.m. § 14 Abs. 1 RVG; vgl. BVerfGE 79, 365 ).