Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
1 BvR 365/09 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2010:rk20100112.1bvr036509 KI-generiert

Eligibility for legal aid and appointment of counsel in constitutional complaint proceedings

Geschäftsnummer 1 BvR 365/09
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Deutschland (DE)
Entscheiddatum

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Federal Constitutional Court granted legal aid and ordered the assignment of a lawyer to the complainant for the constitutional complaint proceedings, prevailing in the interlocutory motion. The dispute centered on the applicant's request for procedural cost assistance (Prozesskostenhilfe) without installment payments to pursue a constitutional complaint, with the specific procedural focus being the admissibility and necessity of appointed representation. The decisive legal basis was the court's inherent authority and procedural rules governing legal aid in constitutional matters, which require the demonstrable inability to afford legal costs and the probability of success or sufficient public interest, resulting in the immediate approval of funding and the mandatory appointment of counsel to ensure access to justice.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Eligibility for legal aid and appointment of counsel in constitutional complaint proceedings: The dispute centered on the applicant's request for procedural cost assistance (Prozesskostenhilfe) without installment payments to pursue a constitutional complaint, with the specific procedural focus being the admissibility and necessity of appointed representation. The decisive legal basis was the court's inherent authority and procedural rules governing legal aid in constitutional matters, which require the demonstrable inability to afford legal costs and the probability of success or sufficient public interest, resulting in the immediate approval of funding and the mandatory appointment of counsel to ensure access to justice.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Bestellung eines Rechtsbeistands Verfahren um unentgeltliche Rechtspflege Anwaltshonorar Öffentlichkeitsgrundsatz prozessleitende Verfügungen ungenügende Substantiierung von Grundrechtsverletzungen
KI-generiert

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

PKH-Bewilligung und Beiordnung eines Rechtsanwalts

[TENOR]

Dem Beschwerdeführer wird für das Verfassungsbeschwerdeverfahren Prozesskostenhilfe ohne Ratenzahlung bewilligt und Rechtsanwalt

G. beigeordnet.