Inadmissibility of revision for failure to fully disclose lower court order on public exclusion under Juvenile Court Act

The Federal Court of Justice (1st Criminal Senate) dismissed the defendant’s appeal as unfounded, ordering the defendant to bear the costs of the proceedings and the incidental costs of the auxiliary plaintiff. The case involved a challenge to a judgment of the Regional Court of Aschaffenburg, wherein the defendant contested the trial court's refusal to exclude the public from the main hearing. The appeal was deemed procedurally inadmissible specifically regarding the alleged violation of juvenile criminal procedure rules, as the defendant failed to fully disclose the lower court’s reasoned order denying the request, thereby concealing the part of the decision that addressed the specific statutory prerequisites. The decisive legal basis for this ruling includes § 349 Abs. 2 StPO (Criminal Procedure Code) for the dismissal of the unfounded revision and § 109 Abs. 1 Satz 5 JGG (Juvenile Court Act) concerning the exclusion of publicity, with the failure to submit the complete prior decision rendering the procedural complaint inadmissible.