Anhörungsrüge dismissed for failure to demonstrate violation of right to be heard

The BGH 2. Strafsenat dismissed the appellant's motion for review (Anhörungsrüge) as inadmissible, with costs imposed on the appellant, thereby upholding its prior order of January 28, 2025. The dispute centered on a procedural challenge to the Senate’s earlier decision, where the appellant alleged a violation of his right to be heard. The court held the motion inadmissible because the appellant failed to adequately demonstrate that such a violation of his right to legal hearing had actually occurred through the Senate’s actions.