Conviction for severe sexual abuse of children and rape; scope of appellate review and costs allocation under § 473 Abs. 1 StPO
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Federal Court of Justice (BGH) 6th Criminal Senate dismissed the defendant's appeal as unfounded, upholding the Landgericht Hannover's conviction with a modified finding of guilt for three counts of severe sexual abuse of children in concurrence with rape and sexual abuse of a ward, and six counts of sexual abuse of children in concurrence with sexual compulsion and sexual abuse of a ward. The defendant bears the costs of the appeal and the necessary expenses incurred by the victim representatives during the appellate proceedings. The case involved a criminal revision challenging the lower court’s judgment regarding multiple offenses of sexual exploitation involving minors and persons in a protective relationship, where the appellate court confirmed the liability based on the combined statutory provisions for severe sexual abuse of children (§ 176 StGB), rape (§ 177 StGB), sexual abuse of a ward (§ 174 StGB), sexual abuse of children, and sexual compulsion.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiert§ 473 Abs. 1 StPO; Conviction for severe sexual abuse of children and rape; scope of appellate review and costs allocation under § 473 Abs. 1 StPO: The defendant bears the costs of the appeal and the necessary expenses incurred by the victim representatives during the appellate proceedings. The case involved a criminal revision challenging the lower court’s judgment regarding multiple offenses of sexual exploitation involving minors and persons in a protective relationship, where the appellate court confirmed the liability based on the combined statutory provisions for severe sexual abuse of children (§ 176 StGB), rape (§ 177 StGB), sexual abuse of a ward (§ 174 StGB), sexual abuse of children, and sexual compulsion.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertCited as the legal basis for ordering the appellant to bear the costs of the legal remedy and the necessary expenses of the victim representatives.
Volltext
Die Revision des Angeklagten gegen das Urteil des Landgerichts Hannover vom 14. Juni 2024 wird aus den Gründen der Antragsschrift des Generalbundesanwalts mit der Maßgabe als unbegründet verworfen, dass der Angeklagte des schweren sexuellen Missbrauchs von Kindern in Tateinheit mit Vergewaltigung und mit sexuellem Missbrauch von Schutzbefohlenen in drei Fällen und des sexuellen Missbrauchs von Kindern in Tateinheit mit sexueller Nötigung und mit sexuellem Missbrauch von Schutzbefohlenen in sechs Fällen schuldig ist.
Der Beschwerdeführer hat die Kosten des Rechtsmittels und die den Nebenklägerinnen im Revisionsverfahren entstandenen notwendigen Auslagen zu tragen (§ 473 Abs. 1 StPO).
Bartel Feilcke Wenske
Fritsche von Schmettau