Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
2 StR 471/23 ECLI:DE:BGH:2024:290824B2STR471.23.0 KI-generiert

Reimbursement of overnight accommodation costs for mandatory defense counsel during revision proceedings

Geschäftsnummer 2 StR 471/23
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Deutschland (DE)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Gutgeheissen (Allowed)
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Federal Court of Justice (BGH) Second Criminal Senate granted a mandatory defense attorney's application for reimbursement, fixing the maximum necessary overnight accommodation costs at 100 EUR for main hearing attendance on October 23, 2024. The dispute concerned whether these expenses were requisite outlays for a counsel whose appointment under § 143 Abs. 1 StPO remains in effect during the revision procedure, including the upcoming trial. The court ruled that the claimed costs were necessary for the proper safeguarding of the defendant's interests, applying the standard that requisite outlays are those without which the appointed lawyer cannot act competently, and determined that 100 EUR represented a sufficient amount for a mid-class hotel according to the guidelines in § 46 Abs. 2 RVG.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

§ 46 Abs. 2 RVG, § 143 Abs. 1 StPO; Reimbursement of overnight accommodation costs for mandatory defense counsel during revision proceedings: The dispute concerned whether these expenses were requisite outlays for a counsel whose appointment under § 143 Abs. 1 StPO remains in effect during the revision procedure, including the upcoming trial. The court ruled that the claimed costs were necessary for the proper safeguarding of the defendant's interests, applying the standard that requisite outlays are those without which the appointed lawyer cannot act competently, and determined that 100 EUR represented a sufficient amount for a mid-class hotel according to the guidelines in § 46 Abs. 2 RVG.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Kostenersatz notwendige Verteidigung strafrechtliches Revisionsverfahren Bestellung eines Rechtsbeistands Parteientschädigung des Rechtsanwalts amtliche Verteidigerentschädigung

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
§ 46 Abs. 2 RVG
Legal basis cited in the operative order to determine the reimbursement of overnight accommodation costs for the mandatory defense attorney.
§ 143 Abs. 1 StPO
Procedural basis cited in the operative order to confirm that the attorney's appointment remains in effect during the revision procedure, justifying the entitlement to expenses.
KI-generiert
2 StR 649/24
Reimbursement of mandatory defense counsel's accommodation expenses for federal criminal revision proceedings under § 46 RVG
2 StR 235/24
Eligibility and cap for public defender overnight accommodation costs in criminal revision proceedings under § 46 RVG
2 StR 161/25
Reimbursement of defense counsel’s travel expenses for mandatory participation in a criminal revision hearing under § 46 Abs. 2 RVG and § 350 Abs. 2 Satz 2 StPO
IV ZR 240/18
Reimbursement of travel costs for party presence in revision proceedings: necessity of appearance balanced against adequate legal representation
1 StR 273/11
Lump sum fee for mandatory counsel in criminal revision hearing based on particular scope and difficulty under § 51 RVG

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
§ 46 Abs. 2 RVG

Legal basis cited in the operative order to determine the reimbursement of overnight accommodation costs for the mandatory defense attorney.

§ 143 Abs. 1 StPO

Procedural basis cited in the operative order to confirm that the attorney's appointment remains in effect during the revision procedure, justifying the entitlement to expenses.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Auf Antrag des Pflichtverteidigers Rechtsanwalt T. G. vom 7. Juni 2024 wird festgestellt, dass für seine Teilnahme an der Hauptverhandlung am 23. Oktober 2024 Übernachtungskosten von höchstens 100 EUR erforderlich sind.

[GRUENDE]

Dem nach § 46 Abs. 2 RVG gestellten Antrag des Pflichtverteidigers, dessen Bestellung gemäß § 143 Abs. 1 StPO auch im Revisionsverfahren einschließlich der Hauptverhandlung fortbesteht, war stattzugeben. Erforderlich sind diejenigen Auslagen, ohne die der beigeordnete Rechtsanwalt die Interessen des Angeklagten nicht sachgerecht wahrnehmen kann (vgl. BGH, Beschluss vom 18. Mai 2022 – 6 StR 643/21). Die Höhe der Übernachtungskosten für ein Mittelklassehotel werden für den in Frage stehenden Zeitpunkt auf maximal 100 EUR festgesetzt; dieser Betrag erscheint auskömmlich.

Menges Meyberg Grube

Schmidt Zimmermann