Anhörungsrüge inadmissible for lack of demonstrated violation of right to be heard; filing inadmissible legal remedy confers no right to case file inspection

The Federal Court of Justice (BGH) Second Criminal Senate dismissed the appellant's complaint for hearing (Anhörungsrüge) as inadmissible, ordering the appellant to bear the costs, thereby upholding the Senate's prior decision from April 30, 2024, and noting that further submissions in this matter would no longer be answered. The dispute concerned the appellant's claim that the Senate violated his right to be heard by failing to grant access to the case files following the filing of an evidently inadmissible legal remedy. The court held that the appellant failed to demonstrate a violation of his right to legal hearing and ruled that the submission of a clearly inadmissible legal remedy does not entitle a party to inspection of the case files.