Adjustment of daily fine rate in criminal revision where no legal error to the defendant's detriment was found
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Federal Court of Justice (BGH) Second Criminal Senate dismissed the defendant's appeal as unfounded, upholding the Landgericht Aachen's judgment of 19 January 2022, with the sole modification that the daily rate for the single fine imposed in case II.2 was set at one euro; the appellant was ordered to bear the costs of the legal remedy. The dispute concerned a criminal conviction where the defendant challenged the sentence, specifically the monetary penalty, arguing for a reduction in the daily rate. The court found no legal error to the defendant's detriment through its review, confirming that the original conviction and sentence stood, subject to the technical correction of the fine's daily rate calculation.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertAdjustment of daily fine rate in criminal revision where no legal error to the defendant's detriment was found: The dispute concerned a criminal conviction where the defendant challenged the sentence, specifically the monetary penalty, arguing for a reduction in the daily rate. The court found no legal error to the defendant's detriment through its review, confirming that the original conviction and sentence stood, subject to the technical correction of the fine's daily rate calculation.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertVolltext
Die Revision des Angeklagten gegen das Urteil des Landgerichts Aachen vom 19. Januar 2022 wird mit der Maßgabe, dass der Tagessatz für die im Fall II.2 der Urteilsgründe verhängte Einzelgeldstrafe auf einen Euro festgesetzt wird, als unbegründet verworfen, da die Nachprüfung des Urteils auf Grund der Revisionsrechtfertigung keinen Rechtsfehler zum Nachteil des Angeklagten ergeben hat.
Der Beschwerdeführer hat die Kosten des Rechtsmittels zu tragen.
Franke
Appl
Eschelbach
Zeng
Schmidt