Criminal revision dismissed for unfoundedness with correction of judgment formula date

The Federal Court of Justice (BGH) rejected the defendant's appeal as unfounded, thereby upholding the guilty verdict and sentence imposed by the Landgericht Schweinfurt, while also correcting a clerical error in the judgment text regarding the date of a prior Landgericht Würzburg decision; the appeal cost was assigned to the appellant. The case involved a criminal appeal challenging the lower court's judgment, where the procedural posture focused on a minor discrepancy in the reference to a previous verdict's date rather than substantive legal arguments. The court's decision rests on the doctrine of formal correction of judgment formulas to ensure legal certainty and procedural accuracy, operating under the standard that appeals are dismissed when they fail to demonstrate substantive legal error, leaving the original conviction and penalty intact.