Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
II ZB 14/22 ECLI:DE:BGH:2022:101022BIIZB14.22.0 KI-generiert

Determination of representative model respondent in KapMuG appeal under § 21

Geschäftsnummer II ZB 14/22
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Deutschland (DE)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The German Federal Court of Justice (BGH) issued a procedural order designating the first named defendant as the representative model respondent (Musterrechtsbeschwerdeführerin) and the plaintiff as the representative model respondent (Musterrechtsbeschwerdegegnerin) regarding their respective legal appeals. This ruling arose within a model proceedings lawsuit (Musterfeststellungsverfahren) under the Model Proceedings Act (KapMuG), where the central issue was the formal allocation of party roles for appellate review purposes. The decisive legal basis for the court's determination was §§ 9, 13, and 21 of the KapMuG, specifically § 21 Abs. 4 and § 21 Abs. 1 Satz 2, which govern the designation of representative parties for appeals in this specialized procedure.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

§ 21 Abs. 4 KapMuG, § 13 Abs. 2 KapMuG, § 9 Abs. 2 KapMuG, § 21 Abs. 1 Satz 2 KapMuG; Determination of representative model respondent in KapMuG appeal under § 21: This ruling arose within a model proceedings lawsuit (Musterfeststellungsverfahren) under the Model Proceedings Act (KapMuG), where the central issue was the formal allocation of party roles for appellate review purposes. The decisive legal basis for the court's determination was §§ 9, 13, and 21 of the KapMuG, specifically § 21 Abs. 4 and § 21 Abs. 1 Satz 2, which govern the designation of representative parties for appeals in this specialized procedure.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
prozessleitende Verfügungen Beschwerdelegitimation E-Justice richterliche Feststellung von Rechten Corpus Juris Einrede der Verfassungswidrigkeit

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
§ 21 Abs. 4 KapMuG
Used to designate the defendant as the model respondent in the appeal.
§ 13 Abs. 2 KapMuG
Cited in conjunction with § 21 Abs. 4 KapMuG for the procedural determination of the model respondent.
§ 9 Abs. 2 KapMuG
Cited in conjunction with § 21 Abs. 4 KapMuG for the procedural determination of the model respondent.
§ 21 Abs. 1 Satz 2 KapMuG
Used to designate the plaintiff as the model opposing party in the appeal.
KI-generiert

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
§ 21 Abs. 4 KapMuG

Used to designate the defendant as the model respondent in the appeal.

§ 13 Abs. 2 KapMuG

Cited in conjunction with § 21 Abs. 4 KapMuG for the procedural determination of the model respondent.

§ 9 Abs. 2 KapMuG

Cited in conjunction with § 21 Abs. 4 KapMuG for the procedural determination of the model respondent.

§ 21 Abs. 1 Satz 2 KapMuG

Used to designate the plaintiff as the model opposing party in the appeal.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Die Musterbeklagte zu 1 wird hinsichtlich der Rechtsbeschwerden auf Seiten der Musterbeklagten zur Musterrechtsbeschwerdeführerin (entsprechend § 21 Abs. 4, § 13 Abs. 2 und § 9 Abs. 2 KapMuG) und hinsichtlich der Rechtsbeschwerde der Musterklägerin zur Musterrechtsbeschwerdegegnerin bestimmt (§ 21 Abs. 1 Satz 2 KapMuG).

Born

B. Grüneberg

V. Sander

von Selle

Adams