Adjustment of statutory interest commencement date on criminal fine in criminal appeal
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Federal Court of Justice (5th Criminal Senate) rejected the defendant's appeal against the judgment of the Hamburg Regional Court of March 4, 2022, with the sole modification that interest on the monetary penalty is payable from February 10, 2022, rather than the date originally ordered. The appellate review found no legal error to the defendant's detriment in the underlying criminal proceedings, which included adhesion claims, and consequently ordered the defendant to bear the costs of the appeal, specific costs arising from the adhesion proceedings, and necessary expenses incurred by the auxiliary and adhesion plaintiffs. The decision rests on the procedural powers of the appellate criminal court to correct errors regarding the calculation period for statutory interest under criminal procedure law, thereby affirming the substantive convictions and sentencing of the lower court while adjusting the financial enforcement timeline.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertAdjustment of statutory interest commencement date on criminal fine in criminal appeal: The appellate review found no legal error to the defendant's detriment in the underlying criminal proceedings, which included adhesion claims, and consequently ordered the defendant to bear the costs of the appeal, specific costs arising from the adhesion proceedings, and necessary expenses incurred by the auxiliary and adhesion plaintiffs. The decision rests on the procedural powers of the appellate criminal court to correct errors regarding the calculation period for statutory interest under criminal procedure law, thereby affirming the substantive convictions and sentencing of the lower court while adjusting the financial enforcement timeline.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertVolltext
Die Revision des Angeklagten gegen das Urteil des Landgerichts Hamburg vom 4. März 2022 wird mit der Maßgabe verworfen, dass Zinsen erst ab dem 10. Februar 2022 zu zahlen sind (vgl. Antragsschrift des Generalbundesanwalts); im Übrigen hat die Nachprüfung des Urteils auf Grund der Revisionsrechtfertigung keinen Rechtsfehler zum Nachteil des Angeklagten ergeben.
Der Beschwerdeführer hat die Kosten des Rechtsmittels, die insoweit durch das Adhäsionsverfahren entstandenen besonderen Kosten und die dem Neben- und Adhäsionskläger im Revisionsverfahren entstandenen notwendigen Auslagen zu tragen.
Cirener
Gericke
Mosbacher
Resch
von Häfen