Recalculation of confiscation amount for criminal proceeds in revision
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Federal Court of Justice (5th Criminal Senate) dismissed the defendant's appeal as unfounded but modified the lower court's judgment by reducing the order for the confiscation of criminal proceeds from the original amount to €113,100, thereby upholding the underlying conviction while adjusting the financial sanction; the defendant is ordered to bear the costs of the appellate proceedings. This decision arose from a criminal appeal against a judgment by the Regional Court of Kiel concerning the withdrawal of value from criminal gains (Einziehung des Wertes von Taterträgen). The decisive legal basis involved the review of the legality and proportionality of the confiscation order under German criminal procedure law, where the appellate court determined that the initial confiscation amount exceeded the legally permissible limit or was otherwise erroneous, necessitating a specific reduction to €113,100 while leaving the rest of the verdict intact.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertRecalculation of confiscation amount for criminal proceeds in revision: This decision arose from a criminal appeal against a judgment by the Regional Court of Kiel concerning the withdrawal of value from criminal gains (Einziehung des Wertes von Taterträgen). The decisive legal basis involved the review of the legality and proportionality of the confiscation order under German criminal procedure law, where the appellate court determined that the initial confiscation amount exceeded the legally permissible limit or was otherwise erroneous, necessitating a specific reduction to €113,100 while leaving the rest of the verdict intact.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertVolltext
Die Revision des Angeklagten gegen das Urteil des Landgerichts Kiel vom 17. Januar 2023 wird mit der Maßgabe als unbegründet verworfen, dass die allein diesen Angeklagten betreffende Anordnung der Einziehung des Wertes von Taterträgen um 100 Euro auf 113.100 Euro reduziert wird (vgl. Antragsschrift des Generalbundesanwalts); im Übrigen hat die Nachprüfung des Urteils auf Grund der Revisionsrechtfertigung keinen Rechtsfehler zum Nachteil des Angeklagten ergeben.
Der Beschwerdeführer hat die Kosten des Rechtsmittels zu tragen.
Cirener
Mosbacher
Resch
von Häfen
Werner