Calculational error in confiscation order valid if not detrimental to defendant

The Federal Court of Justice (BGH) rejected the defendant's revision, upholding the lower court's judgment and ordering the defendant to bear the costs of the legal remedy. The dispute concerned a criminal conviction where the defendant challenged the decision regarding the confiscation of the value of criminal proceeds; the appellate court confirmed that the underlying monetary amounts were sufficiently derived from the judgment's reasoning, noting that an addition error committed by the lower court did not prejudice the defendant. This decision relies on the procedural principle that a clerical or mathematical error in the aggregation of confiscation amounts is permissible if it does not result in a higher or more burdensome penalty for the accused, thereby validating the final confiscation order.