Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
VIa ZR 1268/22 ECLI:DE:BGH:2023:020323BVIAZR1268.22.0 KI-generiert

Withdrawal of revision in civil proceedings: cost allocation and mootness of precautionary non-admission complaint

Geschäftsnummer VIa ZR 1268/22
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Deutschland (DE)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang struck_off
Kostenauflage zulasten Beschwerdeführer/in
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Federal Court of Civil Procedure (BGH) ordered the plaintiff to bear the costs of the revision instance and declared the revision futile following its withdrawal, thereby leaving the judgment of the Munich Higher Regional Court of 28 July 2022 in force; a concurrently filed application for leave to appeal on points of law was dismissed as moot. The dispute, involving a principal amount of up to €7,000, concerned a civil matter where the appellate court had decided only on the main applications and granted unrestricted leave for revision, rendering the precautionary legal complaint against non-admission of the revision procedurally superfluous. The decisive legal basis for the cost allocation and the procedural status of the withdrawn revision was § 565 Sentence 1 in conjunction with § 516 Paragraph 3 of the German Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO), which mandates that the party withdrawing a revisionary appeal bears the costs if the appeal is declared futile.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

§ 516 Abs. 3 ZPO; Withdrawal of revision in civil proceedings: cost allocation and mootness of precautionary non-admission complaint: The dispute, involving a principal amount of up to €7,000, concerned a civil matter where the appellate court had decided only on the main applications and granted unrestricted leave for revision, rendering the precautionary legal complaint against non-admission of the revision procedurally superfluous. The decisive legal basis for the cost allocation and the procedural status of the withdrawn revision was § 565 Sentence 1 in conjunction with § 516 Paragraph 3 of the German Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO), which mandates that the party withdrawing a revisionary appeal bears the costs if the appeal is declared futile.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
zivilrechtliche Revision Verfahrenskosten Streitgegenstand Rückzug des Revisionsgesuchs Rückzug der Zivilklage Zivilstand

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
§ 516 Abs. 3 ZPO
Die Kosten der Revision werden dem Kläger auferlegt (§ 565 Satz 1, § 516 Abs. 3 ZPO).

Zitierte Rechtsprechung

KI-generiert
XI ZR 434/15
Validity of contractual extension of withdrawal period conditions via illustrative examples of mandatory loan information
BGHZ 213, 52
November 2016 - XI ZR 434/15, BGHZ 213, 52 Rn.
BGHZ 233, 16
Februar 2022 - VIa ZR 8/21 BGHZ 233, 16 Rn.
KI-generiert
VII ZR 852/21
Dismissal of complaint against non-admission of revision in civil procedure and dispensation from reasoning
VII ZR 208/22
Non-admission of revision in civil dispute: omission of reasoning and cost allocation under § 544(6) and § 97(1) ZPO
VIa ZR 98/22
Cost allocation after withdrawal of revision and claim in civil litigation
VII ZR 886/21
Dismissal of non-admission of revision in civil liability dispute
VII ZR 773/21
Procedural mootness via partial withdrawal of appeal and claim; cost allocation in civil litigation

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Der Kläger wird, nachdem er die Revision gegen das am 28. Juli 2022 verkündete Urteil des 14. Zivilsenats des Oberlandesgerichts München zurückgenommen hat, dieses Rechtsmittels für verlustig erklärt.

Die vorsorglich eingelegte Nichtzulassungsbeschwerde war, weil das Berufungsgericht nur über die Hauptanträge entschieden und insoweit die Revision unbeschränkt zugelassen hat, von Anfang an gegenstandslos (vgl. BGH, Urteil vom 22. November 2016 - XI ZR 434/15, BGHZ 213, 52 Rn. 5 f.; Urteil vom 21. Februar 2022 - VIa ZR 8/21 BGHZ 233, 16 Rn. 17 ff.).

Die Kosten der Revision werden dem Kläger auferlegt (§ 565 Satz 1, § 516 Abs. 3 ZPO).

Streitwert: bis 7.000 €

Menges

Möhring

Krüger

Wille

Liepin